Code: Select all
[url=https://ibb.co/FVzk547][img]https://i.ibb.co/FVzk547/Preview-of-La-Brass-Banda.jpg[/img][/url]
Code: Select all
[url=https://ibb.co/FVzk547][img]https://i.ibb.co/FVzk547/Preview-of-La-Brass-Banda.jpg[/img][/url]
Do you mean that you going to Marines?ortwin wrote: Again I am confident that I can break the half hour barrier with this setup before Marines Festival.
What can I say, Jim invited me to come and set up a table with some tops.ta0 wrote: ...
Do you mean that you going to Marines?![]()
ortwin wrote:What can I say, Jim wrote invited me to come and set up a table with some tops.ta0 wrote: ...
Do you mean that you going to Marines?![]()
I feel very honored!
So I accepted the invitation. Hopefully the corona situation will allow it to happen.
Marines is only beginning next year! So you will still have most of the budget available for 2022!ta0 wrote: ...my spintop travel budget is going through the roof, but I might have no other option that to also come to this one!![]()
![]()
![]()
...
Ich würde dich auch gerne zu treffen.ortwin wrote: Es freut mich, dich dann persönlich zu treffen!
Iacopo wrote:Thank you, Ortwin !ortwin wrote: Two further exquisite Simonelli tops! Congratulations Iacopo!
The new part of the method is the use of the laser pen.ortwin wrote: I also like it that you present this new balancing method.
I have been using this method for years, both for static and couple balance. I explained it in a video on my YouTube channel six years ago, a bit more in detail.
I haven't much experience with ball tips but I don't see why it shouldn't work with them, especially with a 0.5 mm ball tip, which is so little and not so different from a pointed tip.ortwin wrote: With your statements that static balance can best be treated at low speed and couple unbalance at high speed and so on, I am not completely happy. It might be perfectly valid for practical purposes especially with your type of tops with the really sharp pointed tip and if you can statically balance it almost perfectly at low speed first - but if I consider my tops with the 0.5 mm tungsten carbide ball tip things could look different.
When I used this method with tops having an external 3/16" tip, it worked.
I understand that it is more difficult to use the paint and brush if the top, because of the ball tip, walks on the spinning surface.
Having a short stem, like in your tops, too, doesn't seem to help.
But the difficulty to detect the direction of leaning of the unbalanced top doesn't mean that the method is wrong.
This is desirable but not always possible, and not so much important anyway.ortwin wrote: ..if you can statically balance it almost perfectly at low speed first..
In the case of these my latest two tops, due to the glass balls, which are empty inside, and with uneven thickness, when I tried to balance them, I found that there was a lot of couple unbalance. For this reason I added the vertical screws, which were not part of the design in the beginning.
After having added the vertical screws, I started balancing the tops at low speed, using only the horizontal screws, until the tops seemed balanced and they didn't wobble anymore. Then I spun the tops at high speed and they didn't appear balanced anymore, there was evident wobble, I corrected it using only the vertical screws. After an important correction of the position of the vertical screws, it is normal that the static balance does not appear so accurate anymore, so at that point I had to check again for the static balance, there was a bit of wobbling, I corrected it with the horizontal screws at low speed, and at that point the overall, (dynamic), balance was good.
You have your top with all those screws, both horizontal and vertical, it is perfect for to experiment with these notions, if you want.
For example, you could adjust the horizontal screws so to make the top statically unbalanced on purpose.
Then you could move the vertical screws and produce a couple unbalance with opposite direction to that of the static unbalance, so that the top could spin apparently balanced. I can show you in which direction to rotate the screws, if you want.
If you try it, you will see that you will be able to make the top to spin apparently balanced, in fact, but only at a certain speed.
Above that speed, the top will wobble, leaned towards the light side, dominated by the couple unbalance.
Below that speed, the top will wobble, leaned towards the heavy side, dominated by the static unbalance.
Iacopo wrote: ....
I miss your experiments for longest spins, I followed them with interest, and your space station tops were great !
I have a stem that should allow in principle multiple finger twirls. But when I tried I noticed very soon that the technique requires quite some practice and that it can be dangerous for the top. So I gave up on that telling myself that I prefer for my tops the single twirls start .Iacopo wrote: Have you ever tried to spin this top with multiple twirls ?
I thought that, accelerating gradually the top, would have posed less stress on the spokes.ortwin wrote:I have a stem that should allow in principle multiple finger twirls. But when I tried I noticed very soon that the technique requires quite some practice and that it can be dangerous for the top. So I gave up on that telling myself that I prefer for my tops the single twirls start .Iacopo wrote: Have you ever tried to spin this top with multiple twirls ?
The video on Amazon is hilarious. "A launch to a new dimension . . . we need you to join us in this cosmic adventure . . . (etc)"ortwin wrote: Wed May 14, 2025 3:20 pm I saw it is also available at Amazon https://www.amazon.com/Plexity-Labs-UFO ... M77W8?th=1
Well, at least that spec is correct. And you didn't even have to use their Astral Axis Spin Base.ortwin wrote: Wed May 14, 2025 3:20 pm It is advertised to run for 15 minutes, so far I managed 14 minutes and a few seconds.