Top 4. The original "Hercules in Chains" presented above. Note how chains attach to flywheel and core.
Ease of use = Poor
Ground clearance ~ 3 mm
Scrape angle ~
2.1 1.1°
Tip resistance = High
Best spin time = 72 s
Play value = Poor
Comments = Insecure grip, poor torque transmission, way too easy to scrape
Relative to Top 4, revised Tops 4b and 4c had...
1. New inboard chain attachments more coaxial with the transverse core
2. New blue flywheel plugs
3. In Top 4b only, outboard chain attachments
above the flywheel
4. In Top 4c only, smaller-diameter core with hard plastic contact
Change 1 improved twirling grip by making the chains more horizontal. Change 2 increased flywheel mass and AMI, probably with reduced TMI/AMI ratio. All that was good for critical speed, but who knows the net effect on flywheel air resistance? What's worse — a bumpier flywheel, or leaving its small peripheral holes wide open, as in Top 4?
And why that stupid core tire in Tops 4 and 4b? Simple: They needed it to have any ground clearance at all. The small space for the core between chains left no other viable LEGO solution.
Top 4b. Same ground clearance as Top 4.
Ease of use = Poor but better than Top 4
Ground clearance ~ 3 mm
Scrape angle ~
2.1 1.1°
Tip resistance = High
Best spin time ~ 45 s (gold tire)
Play value = Poor but better than Top 4
Top 4c. Increased ground clearance, much lower tip resistance.
Ease of use = Fair
Ground clearance ~ 5 mm
Scrape angle ~
3.5 1.8°
Tip resistance = Low
Best spin time ~ 85 s
Play value = Pretty good
ConclusionsTop 4c was the keeper here, as it had the best ease of use, play value, and spin time: Top 4 = 72 s, Top 4b = 45 s, Top 4c = 85 s. In fact, Top 4c was close to Top 5 on these fronts.
Air resistance varied little in this series, but tip resistance, mass properties, and release speed varied significantly. The big drop in spin time from Top 4 to 4b suggests that even a little more weight on the tire's rubber contact made tip resistance a lot worse.
Why did Top 4c spin so much longer than 4b despite a higher critical speed? Much lower tip resistance + significantly higher release speed — the latter due to a less challenging scrape angle. How? With more wiggle room, I could apply more starting torque without scraping or spreading the inboard chain attachments apart.