I'm not found of scoring, but I'll do my best, with as much of bad faith as I am able.
Jim :
spinning capacity : obviously not bad, but nothing really exciting. It deserves 3 points, no more.
look/production : By the sight of the pic, not much, the spoke is too badly bent as TaO said. But the video is really great, good jazz, very nice colours and shadows. Should have deserved 5, would the beginning of the throw be inside the screen. So only 4 points.
intention/ creativity : Ray's idea maybe, but one can feel a personal style. 3.
3 4 3, that is 10.
Jorge :
spinning capacity : OK, it's a throw top, so it should be better than an average finger top. But when you throw it, it spins for a very short time; you say you can boomerang it, well, let's say I have to believe you without any evidence; So I do say a throw top which spins so badly do not deserve more than 3.
look/production : In my opinion, showing one brand has nothing respectable nor adds anything to the look. By showing two of them, you make it worse. But the button makes me laugh and I am a kind soul, I'll give 2 points.
intention/ creativity: I have to admit the level is high. Great idea, the components have a perfect fit, elegant solution for the cone. 5 points, the higher possible note.
3 2 5, all in all, 10.
Last but not least, Pierre:
spinning capacity: not bad, a very good balance (as Jorge had to admit) as every single top of mine, but could have been better: 3.
look/production: I admit using holographic paper for every top is kind of a repeated cheating. 1 point, not more.
intention/ creativity: definitely absolutely awesome. 5 tops instead of the only one presented by my poor colleagues, more constraints than expected and beautifully followed, magic fingers, the vid shows as much suspense and surprises as a Hitchcock movie. So it deserves no less than 6 points.
3 1 6, that's 10, much more than the others. In my opinion, I win.