iTopSpin

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Author Topic: 3.14159 26535 89793 23846 26433 83279 50288 41971  (Read 1776 times)

jim in paris

  • ITSA
  • Demigod member
  • **********
  • Posts: 3900
  • "oeuvre de coeur prend tout un homme
    • my vids on  youtube
3.14159 26535 89793 23846 26433 83279 50288 41971
« on: March 15, 2019, 02:53:45 PM »

hi all!Pi day was yesterday 3-14
simple question from a Boeotian :
how far are spinning tops influenced by the pi number ?

thanx for your inputs 8)

jim
Logged
"oeuvre de coeur prend tout un homme"

Jeremy McCreary

  • ITSA
  • Demigod member
  • **********
  • Posts: 3781
    • MOCpages
Re: 3.14159 26535 89793 23846 26433 83279 50288 41971
« Reply #1 on: March 15, 2019, 07:53:30 PM »

how far are spinning tops influenced by the pi number ?

Short answer: Pretty far. Now for the long answer...

Angular speed: Our friend pi enters top physics at many points, starting with the conversion of rotational frequency N in RPM to angular speed w in rad/s...

w = pi N / 30 ~ N / 10

Hence, a top spinning at N = 1,000 RPM has an angular speed of w = 105 rad/s. The latter is the natural measure of rotational speed in physics and engineering and the only one routinely used in the relevant equations.

Linear (circumferential) speed: Every material point on or within a perfectly rigid top has the same angular speed w, but its linear or circumferential speed u grows with radius r from the spin axis according to

u = r w

So a marking located r = 0.100 m (100 mm) from the center of a top spinning at w = 105 rad/s (1,000 RPM) streaks through a given line of sight at a whopping u = 10.5 m/s (37.8 kph), while a marking located at half the radius goes by at half that speed. These speeds are plenty fast enough for optical illusions based on flicker fusion (aka persistence of vision).

Topmakers have been exploiting the power and versatility of the spinning top as an illusion-generating platform for centuries, and to wonderful effect. The reason is simple: A top packs a lot of linear speed across the visual field in a very small space. Pi enters the picture through w.

Centrifugal and Coriolis forces: Every small mass m making up a top experiences an outwardly radial centrifugal force Fcen given by

Fcen = m w2 r,

where r is the radius from spin axis to m's own CM, and w is the top's angular speed. The dependence on the square of w means that every top will turn to dangerous shrapnel at some speed. I'm careful to make my LEGO tops safe for speeds well above those attainable by hand. Designing for safety with a high-speed starter is a much bigger challenge.

Fighting centrifugal force may be a fact of life in topmaking, but you can still have fun with it by incorporating parts that move outward under centrifugal force in controlled ways. The LEGO blacklight centrifugal top below is a case in point.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tG-szSIt84A

When centrifugal force drives one of the freely swinging arms outward at speed v, the arm also experiences a lesser sideways Coriolis force Fcor perpendicular to Fcen. The magnitude of the Coriolis force is given by

Fcor = 2 m w v,

where m is now the mass of the arm. Centrifugal and Coriolis forces involve pi through at least w.

Volume and mass: The mass M of a top of uniform density D and volume V is

M = D V

If the top is hollow, V includes only the solid parts -- e.g., walls and tip in a hollow peg top. If the top has a shape of revolution with a relatively simple mathematical description, the volume generally has the form

V = pi B,

where B is a function of maximum radius R, axial length L, and perhaps other parameters (mostly top proportions), but not of pi. For example, if the top is a uniform solid cylinder with stem and tip of negligible mass, then

V = pi R2 L = pi B

B = V / pi = R2 L

M = D V = pi D R2 L = pi D B

Hence, pi enters many top-related equations via M. Contact processes produce braking torques that generally grow with M. Tip friction is only the beginning here.

Moments of inertia: A real top's spin-down behavior is controlled mostly by its CM-contact distance H (aka CM height), its axial moment of inertia I3 about the spin axis, its transverse moment of inertia I1 about the CM, its tip radius of curvature, and its aerodynamics. For basic top shapes, these moments of inertia can always be written in the form

Ik = M R2 Gk,

where k points to the axis of interest, M is the top's total mass, R is its maximum radius from the spin axis, and Gk is a dimensionless geometric factor depending only on top proportions and the axis of interest.

For the cylindrical top example above, G3 = 1/2, and G1 = (3 + a2) / 12, where a = L / R is the cylinder's aspect ratio. For a thin circular disk with a2 << 3, G1 = 1/4. Since these geometric factors never involve pi, the moments of inertia will involve pi only if M does through its volume V.

Precession and nutation rates: The usual formula for precession rate p (an angular speed) is

p = M g H / I3 w3,

where g is the acceleration of gravity, H is the CM-contact distance, and w3 is the total angular speed about the spin axis. Our friend pi enters implicitly in p and w3. Any occurrences in M and I3 cancel.

On the other hand, pi cancels completely out of the following formula for nutation rate n in fast tops if you (i) consider that n is also an angular speed and (ii) include all implicit occurrences of pi on both sides.

n = (I3 / I1) w3

Critical angular speed for stable steady precession: Writing this critical speed as w3C, we have

w3C2 = 4 (I1 + M H2) M g H cos(A) / I32,

where I1 is still about the CM, and A is the tilt angle. Though pi completely cancels out of the right-hand side of this equation, it's still implicit in w3C on the left.

Note that critical speed depends most strongly on H and not at all on M, as mass cancels out of this equation completely. To see this, rewrite the moments on inertia as

Ik = M R2 Gk

as I did above and define the relative CM-contact distance

h = H / R,

where R is still the top's maximum radius. Critical speed is then given by

w3C2 = (4 g / R) (G1 + h2) h cos(A) / G32

At this point, nothing depends on mass. And the only parameter depending on the top's absolute size is R, as the geometric factors G1 and G3 depend only on top proportions.

Aerodynamic braking torque: The von Karman formula for the aerodynamic braking torque exerted on the faces of a spinning disk also includes pi -- both explicitly and implicitly via w. The same is likely to be true for other top shapes. I'll spare you the math.

Bottom line: Tops are crawling with pi.
« Last Edit: January 30, 2024, 08:14:33 PM by Jeremy McCreary »
Logged
Art is how we decorate space, music is how we decorate time ... and with spinning tops, we decorate both.
—after Jean-Michel Basquiat, 1960-1988

Everything in the world is strange and marvelous to well-open eyes.
—Jose Ortega y Gasset, 1883-1955

ta0

  • Administrator
  • Olympus member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14235
    • www.ta0.com
Re: 3.14159 26535 89793 23846 26433 83279 50288 41971
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2019, 12:46:51 AM »

Wow! That was a pretty exhaustive answer, Jeremy!

But the dirty secret is that, in practical calculations, for 90% of the cases you only need the digits 3.14. The digits 3.142 would cover 99% of practical problems, in 99.9% you get by with 3.1416 and 99.999% are covered with 3.14159.
You only need more digits if you are doing pure math or applied math such as cryptography.
Logged

Jeremy McCreary

  • ITSA
  • Demigod member
  • **********
  • Posts: 3781
    • MOCpages
Re: 3.14159 26535 89793 23846 26433 83279 50288 41971
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2019, 01:33:29 AM »

Wow! That was a pretty exhaustive answer, Jeremy!

Exhausting is more like it.
Logged

jim in paris

  • ITSA
  • Demigod member
  • **********
  • Posts: 3900
  • "oeuvre de coeur prend tout un homme
    • my vids on  youtube
Re: 3.14159 26535 89793 23846 26433 83279 50288 41971
« Reply #4 on: March 16, 2019, 02:42:27 AM »

thank you very much, Jeremy !

your message should be made a sticky-post !



jim
Logged

Christop

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 76
Re: 3.14159 26535 89793 23846 26433 83279 50288 41971
« Reply #5 on: March 16, 2019, 04:07:28 AM »

Thank you Jeremy! That is a great post and I learned a ton. Think I'm going to go apply this knowledge to a top simulation demo for my portfolio.
Logged

Jeremy McCreary

  • ITSA
  • Demigod member
  • **********
  • Posts: 3781
    • MOCpages
Re: 3.14159 26535 89793 23846 26433 83279 50288 41971
« Reply #6 on: March 16, 2019, 02:37:43 PM »

thank you very much, Jeremy ! your message should be made a sticky-post !

Thank you Jeremy! That is a great post and I learned a ton. Think I'm going to go apply this knowledge to a top simulation demo for my portfolio.

Thanks for the kind words! Just so you know, I'll be refining this from time to time without marking the changes.

Christop, eager to see that simulation when it's ready.
« Last Edit: March 16, 2019, 07:18:17 PM by Jeremy McCreary »
Logged