The total scores of every player are here: https://spintops.org/2022-world-results/
ok estan los puntos efectivos pero los positivos y negativos que son los que dan el resultado final efectivo y en que estan basados como se obtiene una calificaccion positiva como obtienes la negativa
se podria ver la transparencia de los jueces imparcial 
nos podran mostrar sus carecteriscas para evaluar por ejemplo yo como podria saber mi calificacion en 2016 para poder comparar con la de taka y la de neef quiero me ayudes a disolver mi ignorancia por favor
The scoring has changed since 2016. We no longer give negative scores for winding or dropping the top. All points are positive.
If you want to have a big score the best approach it to show a large variety of distinct tricks: each time a judge sees a different trick, he/she is forced to give it at least 1 point (or more points, depending on the difficulty.) On the other hand, when you repeat a trick it may get a lower score or no score at all. With the current level of play, the basic regeneration to keep the top going during a routine, which are roller coasters (lazadas) in most routines, may only score a few points at the beginning of the routine (that's a big handicap for how chonkakegoma is traditionally played). And try to make the tricks distinct and big: if the variations are small and too technical the judges might not differentiate them.
The perceived difficulty of the tricks changes with time. When Takeshi first tried (and Eli succeeded) with a behind the back whip on stage, it got the maximum score from me, with a full difficulty bonus. But now (at least on the video format) it's a trick done by many players (even 11 year old Nobu) so, although I still score it as a very difficult trick, I don't give it the same extra bonus.
For originality, it's not necessary for me that a trick is the first time I see it. If I know that that particular player has recently invented the trick I would still give him/her the originality bonus. In fact, it's better that the player posts the trick before the freestyle so it's easier to recognize and score.
On the open division, the technical score is 85% and the performance/presentation score is only 15%. But this can become important when scores are tight. For example, this year Kanta got the highest performance score from 7 judges and 2nd highest from the other one, while Marcus only got a couple of ties for 3rd highest performance score. Of course, for traditional, where the scores are 70% and 30%, the performance score is much more important.
As a judge, my main concern is that we choose correctly the first place. For video submissions, where I can score the routines more than once, I concentrate on the top routines which I score multiple times. This year Kanta was scored 1st by six judges and 2nd by the other two judges, so I'm confident that we chose the correct winner and as a chief judge that's what I care about. As you go down the list, if somebody got place number 12 or 16 is less important. For this reason, I reviewed all the routines and selected about half that had any chance of being competitive to place somewhere in the first third: those routines were scored by all the judges. The rest were scored by just 3 or 2 judges each, so their scores are probably not very consistent.
